Supreme Court orders ex-Plateau Gov, Dariye‎ to face his trial over corruption charges

 

Report gathered that, the Supreme Court on Friday dismissed an interlocutory appeal which has stalled the trial of former Plateau State Governor, Joshua Dariye, for corruption charges since 2007.

Justice Sylvester Ngwuta who delivered the lead judgment described the scenario played out in the entire case as ‎a “sad commentary” on the nation’s fight against corruption.

In a unanimous judgment ‎by the five-man panel, the court ordered the accused to return to the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Gudu, Abuja, to face his trial.

The Supreme Court described as unmeritorious, Dariye’s appeal against the earlier decision of the Court of Appeal, Abuja, on his preliminary objection challenging the competence of the charges ‎instituted against him and the jurisdiction of the FCT High Court to entertain the suit.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had, on July 13, 2007 arraigned the former governor on 23 counts of money laundering and other corruption charges allegedly involving “billions of naira” belonging to the Plateau State Government.

The EFCC accused the former governor of among others, diversion of about N1.2bn of the state’s ecological funds into the account of Ebenezer Ratnen Venture, which is one the companies through which he allegedly siphoned the public funds.

The trial judge, Justice Adebukola Banjoko of the FCT High Court in Gudu, Abuja, had scheduled trial to commence on November 13, 2007 when the former governor filed his notice of preliminary objection challenging the court’s jurisdiction and the competence of the charges.

‎The appellant had contended that the FCT High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit since the alleged offences involved funds belonging the Plateau State Government.

He thus argued that he ought to have been tried in Jos and urged the court to quash the entire 23 counts preferred against him.

However, the apex court, in resolving all the four issues formulated against the former governor, held that the Court of Appeal was right to have affirmed the ruling of the FCT High Court which had dismissed his notice of preliminary objection.

 

Advertisements

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*